A decision was made in the slander case of New York Times opened by Justin Baldoni

A decision was made in the slander case of New York Times opened by Justin Baldoni

The New York Times won a temporary legal victory at the high -profile hearing on diplomacy by Justin Baldoni. The regional judge decided by accepting the accuracy of the publication and suspending the collection of evidence of the obstacles in the case.

Justin Baldoni. Photo: Getty Images

Judge Lewis J. Liman decided that the New York Times Tableid showed a good evidence in favor of the deviation of the claim, and that the implementation of the newspaper would probably be considered mainly. This decision deprives Baldoni’s opportunity to demand documents and evidence from the newspaper, which in fact means suspended the hearing.

“The court forbade Mr. Baldoni from uploading the New York Times with demands in a case that should not be in principle. We are happy with such a decision of the judge, because he confirmed the importance of preserving freedom of expression. ”

Justin Baldoni and Blake Livilly. Photo: Legion-Media

In a case against Slander, Justin Baldoni accuses Blake Liville of prejudicing the New York Times’s complaint about sexual harassment. Such an advantage gave journalists time to prepare an article from 4,000 words with photographs, graphics and quotations from the speech he took in the California Civil Legal Department in December last year. The chronology of scandal Blake Liville and Justin Baldoni. Read here.

Source: People Talk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Trending

Related POSTS