Avoiding First Amendment Core of Johnny Depp’s $50 Million Case Against Amber Heard Could Prove Key to Victory: Analysis

On the eve of the first full day of jury deliberations, Johnny Depp’s $50 million defamation lawsuit against Amber Heard turned out to be misguided and heinous.

Six weeks later, plaintiff and defense adjourned their cases on Friday, and a seven-member jury finally decided behind closed doors on the court drama.

How to watch Johnny Depp-Amber Hear trial: Livestream Link and more

Glasses-wearing Depp and Heard sat with their lawyers in the Fairfax district courtroom last week, delivering bellicose closing arguments that seemed to shine the other side in the most toxic light. Oddly enough, the defense has waited the last few hours to settle the issue of first amendment, an option that may have been lost in the rush of celebrities since the trial began on April 11. Not surprisingly, Depp and Heard have been on the air twice. The case captivated much of the country and beyond with its sensational and exciting soap opera nature, and captivated commentators with its potential social ramifications.

This is exactly the case with most seemingly lost narcotics, private islands, gold prospecting, sexual assaults, private planes, and severed fingers. Physical, mental, verbal and sexual assaults of a person released in court and at trial fantasy monsters The actor once thought it was Depp who sued his ex-wife in late 2018 in March 2019. Washington post The actress wrote, “a public figure representing domestic violence.”

An ACLU article compiled by Jeff Bezos’ newspaper argued that Depp “destroyed” his now-dead career, though it made no mention of Depp. Depp also argued that the person who was abused in the relationship was actually himself.

In the summer of 2020, Herd was unable to dismiss the lawsuit or move to Virginia for $100 million. The move comes just months before Depp’s smears in England. Inside. Describing it as “beating the snow,” the tabloid turned into a dramatic fiasco in November 2020.

Outside of the Virginia courtroom in this case, there was a daily circus-like atmosphere from the start that was mostly created by the fans. Pirates of the Caribbean Actor. For many of those who call themselves the “Depford wives,” they are the idols that stand before the court. A small group of fans. water man Meanwhile, the Swarm star wonders why the #MeToo movement didn’t file her lawsuit or why the actor wasn’t treated as the victim of Harvey Weinstein, who was jailed.

But this is a case of slander that Depp has willingly voiced on both sides of the Atlantic not just once, but to some extent twice. Warner Bros. Powered by the latest from JK Rowling. fantasy monsters Photo Shortly after the devastating decision in the UK, Depp found that his attempt to appeal to the UK was rejected.

Although Herd admitted to referring to Depp during the trial Wow As we’ve said, Depp’s threshold to prove defamation, like all cases involving public figures, is high, even higher than in the UK case. Demanding a unanimous decision, Depp must prove that Herd’s writing was not only false, but written with a true crime.

Did this happen?

During the trial, Depp and Herd presented a wealth of evidence that was discussed through audio recordings, video clips, and nasty text messages, which is probably one of the reasons why the case has become so appealing to so many people.

When it comes to verbal abuse, the Swarm team said, among other examples, that Depp leaked to TMZ and banged on lockers and asked his then-wife “Do you want to look crazy?” He points to a video he says. I’m going to drive you crazy.” He then seems to have picked up his phone. As for the physical abuse, the Swarm has gone through many accusations and arguments. More specifically, the actor claimed that Depp kicked him in the head and plucked strands of hair during a shootout in December 2015. Law His team showed photos he later said were taken, with bruises under his eyes and nose, and a bunch of hair on the floor.

Depp said he was performing with his wife that night, but it was a coincidence.

And to Herd’s surprise, he said it was he who had been insulted.

Depp’s legal team also offered a voiceover that showed the Herd mocking Depp and his career when Brown faced off against Benjamin Chuu and Camille Vasquez, admitting the next moment: “I didn’t clenched my fist. In an incident that was repeatedly quoted and analyzed during the trial, Depp claimed that during an argument in March 2015, Herd threw a large bottle of vodka at him, cut the end of his finger with a bullet and burst the glass. He went into detail about the bottles and many other sexual assaults. The same angry Depp hurt her figure while filming a rock movie in Australia, Herd said. Pirates of the Caribbean: The Dead Tell No Tales.

All this was presented in detail using not only video and audio recordings, but also psychologist recordings, diaries and x-rays. As for Depp’s finger, he encountered an orthopedic surgeon on one side and an orthopedic specialist on the other. It should be noted that both paid generously for their time and knowledge.

Duel confirms whether or not each of them is defamation, although it omits an important point in the defamation case.

Depp’s claim is that Heard once insulted him as his blockbuster career was affected by it. Mail Opinion article. Herd’s team offered testimony from Depp’s then-UTA agent that the actor’s late arrival on set and drug use had become a major problem in 2015, even before the couple issued a restraining order. Temporary ban in 2016 and 2016. Herd’s legal team, Ben Rothenborn, argued that Disney tried to fire Depp. pirates franchise first Mail Depp wrote, even though he didn’t benefit at all from it, admitting that if he did today, he wouldn’t have accepted the role.

When Rothenbourne asked Depp during the cross-examination: “If Disney came to you with $300 million and a million alpacas, nothing in the world would force you to work with Disney again. Pirates of the Caribbean film? TRUE? “Right,” said Depp.

Besides these moments of clarity, it’s a mystery why Herd’s team allowed themselves and a client to scrutinize the details of the couple, rather than focusing more on the elements needed to prove a defamation case. And every quarrel and disagreement. If the strategy is to beat Depp’s team at their own game and reset the jury with lots of photos, text, and audio clips to conclude that it will challenge common sense, there hasn’t been at least one case of domestic violence. edward scissorsActor: The pack team lost the story and sometimes the attention of the jury.

The reality is that Herd just needs to show that what he wrote about the transmission of domestic violence, which can take many forms, is an accurate statement. From any perspective, it seems clear that Heard’s team was almost completely free from the attack, raising an obvious question during the trial: If this is a defamation case, why isn’t Johnny Depp suing? ? Washington post?

Again Mail The Virginia publication of his article was initially offered as one of the grounds for Herd’s complaint in the Old Dominion, and surprisingly, the company was never indicted in this case.

The answer may be that Depp didn’t want to risk a fight with Bezos and instead chose to file for another divorce over slander; secondly, with the risks of his and the Pack’s dirty laundry spreading to the public, as in court. He’s been in Judge Penny Azkarate’s courtroom for the past three years, and especially the last two months. Depp’s former agents and executives may have been convinced that what really hurt his career was his continued judgment in court, but Depp seems confident that this is a strategy that will justify him, even though he has admitted to the violence accusations. There will always be a black mark on your reputation.

When he appeared on the witness stand last week, a somewhat upset Depp again told the jury: “Whatever happens, I came here and told the truth and talked about what I was doing. He reluctantly returned six years. ”

Maybe you are right.

Perhaps the attention he received at the trial dealt him a better blow in court than any divorce case. Maybe he will win somehow even if he loses in this ordeal. As repulsive as it may sound to lawyers, it can be seen as a turning point against the #MeToo movement. Or perhaps even losing his first case, he’s seen as the oddball person he met to a crowd of fans outside of court.

Arriving at court, Depp told the cameras: “Alpacas. Dinosaurs All kinds of items. It’s like heaven.” His followers liked it. The media praised him. Online, The Swarm was brutally attacked and demoted, repeatedly demanding no restraint from Depp; in fact, the radius of the blast accurately captured the “global humiliation” that the actor promised to topple his ex-wife. showed.

No matter who wins, we know very well that more lawsuits or appeals will come, the question now is whether the jury can get past the circus of dense fog and focus on a real legal principle. First change or not, a lot is expected at this point.