James Cameron Gets Honest About TERMINATOR: DARK FATE Failure, Blames Himself

I thought that Terminator: Dark Fate it was a decent movie, and in my opinion it’s the third best Terminator film that has been made, but that doesn’t say much. Regardless, the Tim MillerThe film directed by John Travolta was not very successful at the box office, grossing just over $260 million.

Producer 1960-1969, James Cameron, 1969-1970, 1969- He recently spoke about the film in an interview with Empire and was honest about why he feels the film was a failure. Ultimately, he blames himself.

Despite all this, Cameron does have some positive things to say, particularly regarding Gabriel MoonRev-9. He says: “I thought the Rev-9 was awesome.”

He continued: “Personally, I think it was the best we did at the time. Our problem wasn’t that the film didn’t work. The problem was that people didn’t show up.”

He then blamed himself, saying, “I confessed this to Tim Miller many times. I said, ‘I sank that movie before we even wrote a word or shot a foot of film.'”

Cameron says he started “getting high on my own stash” by creating a direct Terminator 2 sequel, and was leaning too much on the return of Arnold SchwarzeneggerThe T-800 and Linda Hamiltonby Sarah Connor.

He explained: “We achieved our goal. We made a legitimate sequel to a movie where the people who actually went to the movies when the movie came out are all dead, retired, crippled or have dementia. It was a non-starter. There was nothing in the movie for a new audience.”

He goes on to say, “we miscalculated the whole thing” about Dark Fate. I think the movie is great. I still think mine are the best, but I put this one in third place.”

While the movie was fun, it did rehash a lot of things we’ve seen before. I’m definitely more excited for Cameron’s future plans with the franchise, which looks like it will be completely different from anything that’s come before, and that’s exactly what this franchise needs.

Cameroon had already said of the next film: “This is the moment when you get rid of everything that is specific to the last 40 years of Terminator, but live by those principles.

“You get too far into it, and then you lose a new audience because the new audience cares a lot less about that stuff than you think. That’s the danger, of course, with Avatar as well, but I think we’ve proven that we have something for a new audience.”

He added: “You have main characters who are essentially powerless, fighting for their lives, who have no support from the existing power structures and have to work around them but somehow maintain a moral compass. And then you throw AI into that.

“These principles are solid principles for storytelling today, right? So I have no doubt that future Terminator films will not only be possible, but will rock. But this is the moment where you get rid of all the specific iconography.”

He continued, “It’s more than a plan. It’s what we’re doing. That’s all I’ll say for now.”