"Joker" : This humiliating TPMP sequence that Matthieu Delormeau refuses to comment on

"Joker" : This humiliating TPMP sequence that Matthieu Delormeau refuses to comment on

While Matthieu Delormeau is quite talkative in an interview with TV Mag (Le Figaro) about invoking Cyril Hanouna and his reasons for leaving the TPMP, on the other hand, he refuses to return to a show that includes too much. talking about…

A few days after the resounding announcement of his departure don’t touch my TVMatthieu Delormeau breaks the silence in an interview television magazine (Le Figaro). For Cyril Hanouna’s former columnist, it’s an opportunity to trust their sometimes strained relationship with C8’s foot, as well as their working philosophy for the show.

When I enter the audience hall at 7 pm, I take this as an invitation to dinner. And when you go out to dinner with people, you’re funny and kind and have a good time.”He explains that he has a job “Trying to make someone forget the hard days”. Although Matthieu Delormeau gave his all to every show, he does not hide the fact that he protected himself. “some bad memories” of this adventureI have to, or I would stay”adds without wanting to say more. “I’ll keep them for myself and my psychiatrist”ends contact.

While our colleague touched on one of the most criticized and controversial scenes of the series, the same desire to remain silent, “noodles in panties“. In January 2016, Cyril Hanouna indeed spilled a bowl of pasta on Matthieu Delormeau’s boxer shorts while welcoming Stéphane Rotenberg. Seven years later, the former columnist TPMP completely and simply refuses to explain how he himself experienced this qualifying action”An insult to human dignity” by some viewers and critics of the show. “Give me a joker as it is game of truth by Patrick Sabatier. I’m getting here” it just answers.

this row TPMP selected by the CSA

CSA, which was captured by the audience after this highly commented and criticized sequence, did not impose any sanctions on the channel, which was still called D8 at that time. In his decision made in the summer of 2016, he underlined the lack of “”.the channel’s failure to fulfill its obligations”.

But the CSA still added a real warning to leaders. “The duplication of such sequences, which may be perceived as a form of humiliation, can become a problem, especially for younger viewers, by trivializing such practices.The sages wrote what he wanted D8 to do “evidence of restraint in the dissemination of images or testimonies likely to humiliate people”.

Clara Kolodny

Source: Programme Television

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Trending

Related POSTS