Amber Heard opened the doors to re-sue Johnny Depp after claiming to have beaten him twice in a new interview on the Today Show, and an expert told DailyMail.com that their latest statement was justification for a “third reason”.
During an explosive interview, which was recorded in New York on Thursday and will be broadcast in three parts over the course of the week, the 36-year-old actress called the decision in the defamation lawsuit against 59-year-old Depp “unfair” and insisted she herself. Less than two weeks after she was convicted of slandering her ex by claiming she had abused him during their marriage, she “will stick to every word of her testimony until the day she dies”.
The 36-year-old actress doubled down on Depp’s allegations that she physically abused her during their one-year marriage, accusing her of “lying” in the stands when she said she “never hit him” while speaking to Today’s host Savannah Guthrie. .
Now, Nicole Haffche, a New York-based entertainment attorney working at Romano Law, explained to DailyMail.com privately how Heard’s comments could backfire and lead to her being sued again by the Pirates of the Caribbean star.
One expert said it opened the doors for Johnny Depp to sue again after Amber Heard lied twice about allegations that he beat her in a new interview on the Today Show.
During the explosive interview, the actress called the verdict of the defamation lawsuit against Depp “unfair” and urged “to withhold every word of her testimony”.
The 36-year-old actress doubled down on allegations that Depp physically abused her, accusing her of “lying” in the stands while speaking to Today’s host Savannah Guthrie.
‘Ditto. This interview could count as a new “release” under the law that leads to a third lawsuit,” the attorney explained when asked if Depp could sue Heard for defaming the Today interview.
According to MincLaw.com, “any person who repeats or reposts slander is subject to the same liability as the publisher of the original defamatory material”, this is known as reposting.
The company states, “A defamatory statement is considered “published” when it is delivered willfully, with willful or careless negligence, or by negligence to anyone other than the person being defamed.” “The buyer should also be able to reasonably understand that the claim is false.”
But Haff added that he wasn’t sure whether it would be wise for Depp to file a third lawsuit against Heard: “Heard’s lawyers have already stated that they have the original decision. They can’t afford it,” he said.
DailyMail.com reached out to Depp’s legal team for comment.
Exes Heard and Depp, who married in 2015 and stayed married for a year before filing for divorce in 2016, argued in court to determine whether the 2018 Washington Post article by Heard in which the actress was accused of domestic violence was libelous. Section
After months of trial, Heard was ordered to pay the plaintiff $10 million in damages and $5 million in non-pecuniary damage, although the second payment under Virginia law was reduced by the judge to $350,000.
Heard received $2 million in compensation for the $100 million he sought in the lawsuit he filed against his ex.
After the trial ended on June 1, Heard’s lawyer Elaine Bredehoft told the Today program that the star was “absolutely” unable to pay Depp the full amount.
In 2020, Depp sued British broadcaster The Sun for calling him a “co-hitter” over Heard’s allegations and eventually lost.
New York-based entertainment attorney Nicole Haff privately explained to DailyMail.com how Heard’s statements could backfire and lead to his re-indictment.
‘Ditto. When asked if it was grounds for a new defamation lawsuit, this interview could be considered a new “publication” under the law that could lead to a third lawsuit,” he said.
Although the jury overwhelmingly favored her ex-husband at the final hearing and found Heard guilty on three counts against her, the former Aquaman refused to withdraw the harassment allegations against her while speaking to Today and indicted Depp. repeating allegations that he was a “liar” and that he beat her during their wedding.
“He said he never hit you. Is that a lie?’ Guthrie, 50, was questioned during the interview, to which Heard answered frankly: “Yes, it is.”
He added, “I will abide by every word of my testimony until the day of my death.”
Heard also accused Depp’s attorneys, Camille Vasquez and Benjamin Chew, of trying to “divert the jury from the real issues” during the trial, admitting they “done better” than his own legal team.
He further argued that the trial questioned his right to freedom of expression under the First Amendment and claimed that he “spoke the truth and spoke against power” but “paid the price”.
When warned about audio clips stolen during the six-week trial in Virginia, where the 36-year-old was told that she had physically abused Depp, Guthrie insisted she was “just responding”. [physical violence]’but it’ never started’.
Haff added that he wasn’t sure this would be a smart move for Depp (pictured in court in April) and added that “the public viewed Depp less positively than before the trial.”
Heard and Depp competed to determine whether a 2018 Washington Post article by Heard accusing the actor of domestic violence defamed Depp. They were depicted in court
“I never had to initiate it, I reacted,” he said. “When you live in violence and that becomes normal – as I have witnessed – you have to adapt”.
Heard added that while he “deeply regrets” the “terrible” and “ugly” things he did and said to Depp, he only acted like someone in extreme psychological distress who “feels that their life is about to end”. “. end.” The issue was “risk”.
“I know a lot of these tapes were made,” he said. They were first leaked online after being edited.
‘What would you hear in these clips? [was] no proof of what happened, it was proof of a negotiation, proof of how to talk to your attacker.
“As I testified in the stands. When your life is in danger, not only are you being blamed for things you shouldn’t be blamed for, but you don’t have the resources or luxury if you’re in a violent dynamic, psychologically, emotionally, and physically. Say, “Hey, this is black and white.” Because it is far from the time you live in.
Heard also insisted that the jury’s decision was influenced by what she called “unfair representation on social media” and her ex-husband, who invited “wage workers and rando” to testify on her behalf.
Source: Daily Mail
