The main problem is not in Zegler, but in Disney’s itself: Why does everyone criticize new snow white?

Disney’s snow white was rebuilt, as the word was fully thrown with allegations: Even before the renter, IMDB users put it only 1.6 out of 10 points, which is the worst indicator of history. The degree in Kinopoisk is slightly better – 3.6. However, after the March 12 premiere, the evaluations of the audience did not change. The cash fees of the film are unlikely to pay the money and spend money.

Even during the production phase, it was understood that there was a problem with Snow White. Fixed scandals only shook the boat. Apparently, a film adaptation of this familiar fairy tale, how did Disney break it? As a result, the same version of the 2019 King of Leo in 2019, the most box office in history and the third box office caricature came to the seventh in a row.

Let’s try to understand how reasonable the critic is. We know Rachel Zegler and Gal Gadot fighting due to different landscapes about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. And from the human point of view, we can understand them, but what does it have to do with the artistic side of the film? Like Trump’s criticism of Zegler’s policy. But it was so that the attitude towards the film was created in advance and the careless expressions of the actress in absenteeism constituted the hate army. In general, this filmmaker is confirmed by the opinion of his son. However, this seems to be the only reason.

Apparently no one should surprise anyone who has the inclusive policy of film studios. But why did the dark -skinned “mermaid” appeared to be commercially successful and there is no Latin American Snow White? Is it just skin color? Strangely, no. In fact, in a re -construction, the creators often refused to focus on the skin and beat the name of the main character in a very creative way: the girl was born in snowfall and survived despite weakness.

His father was happy when he could find a new love after his wife’s death, and in a long time, when he did not realize a bad essence that emphasized the kindness of his heart. Otherwise, the hero may be accused of egoism. What Zegler says is in mind, “He doesn’t understand why he and his stepmother should be a rival.”

Zegler’s words about the prince, who appeared to him a follower in the cartoon, because everyone concluded that the actress was often against love. Actually, there are no princes in the re -production. Instead, Jonathan (Andrew Bernap), who reminded Flin from Rapunzel, was played by Andrew Bernap).

The closures in the construction are very small compared to the standards of the Western audience. Dark -skinned characters actually have no copies, except for a hunter.

The dwarfs, which should be the spirit of the film, turned out to be the main disadvantage. If the producers initially did not create an excitement around the “Snow White ,, everything would be on their way, claiming a completely new look at the story. He even pulled Peter Dinklage to the project. Apparently, one of the actors was accepted as a film consultant. And the actor was enthusiastic. Why didn’t it burn – this will remain a mystery.

As a result, Disney refused to invite actors with a dwarf and replaced them with CGI-gnomes. And no, it turned out that they were not scary as you expected in terms of graphics. But when compared with other projects of the studio, they still have nothing in them. In fact, we just showed a little bit of a Simpleton’s story and explained why he couldn’t speak.

The main problem is that history would not lose anything without any power. They do not affect the narrative. In general, this is like a snow -white, but there is no seven dwarfs.

Of course, the interpretation can be expected to be different from the classic version: ultimately generations and values ​​have changed. The problem is that like many Hollywood film studio, Disney encourages the agenda, in fact, the same story describes the same story under the guise of Snow White. And this story is about rebellion against the system. In the end, the Snow White becomes almost a revolutionary against the evil guys who say that people need a strong hand.

If the stepmother dies in the original 1937, falls from the cliff and the story ends, then it is more interesting in the reconstruction of the character of Gal Gadot. It is important to physically eliminate the opponent physically to show that the competitor will be ready for the sake of the Snow White, and therefore puts his sword in his hands.

In general, the acting game Gal Gadot compensates for the lack of sound in many ways, but in the case of Rachel Zegler, everything is the opposite. Since the musical Zegler’s actress is organic in the performance of dance and songs, many dramatic scenes are felt.

Snow White was not a real adaptation and was quite good aesthetically: even if you close your eyes to the dwarfs, the backgrounds, forest animals and costumes create a magic atmosphere. The relationships between heroes are quite traditional.

However, there is a feeling that Disney producers cannot choose which agenda they will be attached: left or right.

This warning made a cruel joke: Everyone was unhappy. Observations of recent years show that the introduction around the film is sometimes more important than the film itself. Controversial expressions created a group of hatred and should be taken into account.

But still, the real problem is not in Zegler, but Disney himself.

The 1937 Snow White, which brings a striking success in the world, is wondering that the Snow White is the first colorful cartoon for innovative technologies. Yes, and Walt received a loan to bring Disney’s idea of ​​a film adaptation. It is unlikely that today’s bosses, who are accustomed to stamping Remake, can make the same dedication. Development is now at least two remakes – moana and lilo and stic. And we think it is time to think about the failure of the new “Snow White ı to the studio bosses about creativity and try to move a legacy.