Today, in Nizhny Novgorod, at the main exhibition house at the Nizhny Novgorod Fair, the people of Peopletalk were built as part of the TSIPR conference. The subject of discussion is “productive creative: Ethics of the use of artificial intelligence in the new media”. How has the life of content creators changed with the development of neural networks, how to work with copyright now and how much ethical and technologies will be used in advertising? In our session, we talked more and more. The moderator, the editor -in -chief of Peopletalk Ksenia Anosova: Dmitry Bolin, Creative Producer Minaev Live and “Idols” project, “Two in Two Moscow in Moscow and Childhood Om. Margarita Lintsevich channel, machine telegram, Dryry “Arnautov (neondazer).
Dmitry Boldin:
“Recently, I have done a problem with Sergey Diaghilev, and all the photos were in terrible quality (because they were shot at the beginning of the last century) and artificial intelligence created them so cool. AI had a story last year. Last year, we had a story of Sergey Minaev and a stand behind a set, a story, a story. When they came out of the coffee table, when they made a loyalty, they played on TV, which they played on TV, which they played on TV, because they played an internship on TV, they played on TV, they played on TV, and when they did something on TV, they played on TV, but the director was absolutely heard.
“I do not use a chat to generate ideas. Generated Texts We are relying on the GPT, A person, a person, a staff
Dmitry Beskromy:
“It’s hard to remember the problem that I didn’t solve using the GPT chat. Any neural network plastic. <…> I urge everyone not to talk about the trends about the trends, because this is a absolutely boring daily routine that surrounds every day. And this is a very pragmatic accelerator. Scenario I don’t use the neural network – tie the lace, prepare the whipped eggs (but I will find the recipe by chat). GPT helps in creative work as a second pilot. This is not a magic pill and not ineffective decoration. This is a great thing for a quick reserve. But I am widely surprised and I would recommend it to everyone, not GPT. The problem of the conversation is that he hallucinations, shine without gods and distributes even the most terrible ideas, because his task is to keep your attention on the platform. ”
Uz We are not talking about the fact that someone will replace someone. My opinion is for artificial intelligence like a moon like a pedestrian. <…> I think everyone saw the cases where everyone was experimented, the men won the case, but it turned out that it was written only using the GPT chat, because then they noticed the sentence that was mistakenly: ım I wrote for you on your request … ”. And I don’t see any problems about it, because when the calculator appeared, we stopped counting in the column. But the problem is that the presence of a calculator did not lead us to cognitive laziness, and we can make a brief jam of books or articles through chat, and therefore we are not interested in a deep work of the material. “
Margarita Lintsevich:
“We never use the GPT conversation to create a full text for us or to invent something creative.
“Correctly Divide The Content into Copyright and Not Copyright. Is Everywhere and Not to Use Some Functions Would Be Strange, BUT We Immedieately Realized That We Would Not Generate Texts.
“We have analyzed which texts and which formats we can give to artificial intelligence and no.
Maxim Arnautov:
“GPT chat is good to perform applied tasks (configuration, material presentation). But it is not a very good tool for creativity. <…> Nervous networks do nothing to me. I’m a professional motion designer and the neural network makes my work on creating a visual base, but the processing and the desired condition-this is still a group of work I have done on my own. ”
“A lot of customers want nerve content, because it is more real, it is easier to do now. You can create any model in any case. All you have to try does not immediately understand that it is a nervous network. Because there is a lot of negativity on the Internet. <…> People believe that they will replace all of us, but I think this is definitely a normal process and that you know how to adapt to a new reality, not the most powerful one. If you want to be someone, you must be honest with yourself and accept the world as it is. <…> We live in a world where people have budgets and customers like to spend rationally – for less money to make the result better. And neural networks help us with this. This is not artificial intelligence, this is a database where a person stands in the rudder. “
The speakers also discussed for a long time about whether AI could replace a person in the future, but Dmitry Beskromy was told in this score: “It does not manage us while he could close the artificial intelligence from the exit.” And that says!
Source: People Talk
Mary Crossley is an author at “The Fashion Vibes”. She is a seasoned journalist who is dedicated to delivering the latest news to her readers. With a keen sense of what’s important, Mary covers a wide range of topics, from politics to lifestyle and everything in between.
