Exclusive: Pavel Priluchny’s lawyer denies rumors that the actor found a way to reduce alimony with the help of his mother and wife

Information spread in the media that the “Major” star found a way to reduce the amount of alimony for children from his first marriage (to Agata Muceniece). Note ed.). Allegedly, Pavel Priluchny’s mother and his wife simultaneously filed a lawsuit in order to receive alimony from the artist for a disabled family member. The celebrity’s mother belongs to herself, and Zepyur Brutyan belongs to her one-year-old son Mikael. We sought comment from the actor’s lawyer to understand the situation.

“The information regarding the claims made by Pavel’s wife and mother for the withdrawal of alimony in their favor, both for their own alimony and for the alimony of little Mikael, is deliberately false and does not correspond to the truth,” said lawyer Oksana Danielova. . He also called on the media to check information before publishing it “to prevent the publication of material containing deliberately false information” about his client and his family.

Pavel Priluchny’s lawyer also denied information that the actor has avoided paying alimony to his children since his first marriage. “In fact, from the moment the marriage with Agatha ended until today, alimony has been and is paid in the amount and in the manner determined by the agreement with her, for which there are relevant procedural documents,” Danielova said.

Another issue that is constantly discussed in the media is the claim that Pavel Priluchny filed a lawsuit to determine the place of residence of his son Timofey due to his unwillingness to pay alimony. “In fact, the basis for initiating the case in question was that the mother refrained from legally registering the relocation of her son to his father (which occurred long before all legal proceedings), in addition to submitting a request to increase the amount of alimony for the child. who is actually alive and dependent on his father. Pavel’s claim in this case is a natural response to the obvious fact of abuse of rights by the second parent and is absolutely logical and justified in this case,” said the artist’s lawyer.

The lawyer also claims that Pavel Priluchny did not create any obstacles to communication between Agata Muceniece and her son and brother and sister Mia. “Yet the court’s decision to forcibly temporarily move Timofey to his mother does not in any way correspond to the interests of the child, given his categorical reluctance to move to his mother. Pavel created all the necessary conditions and in every possible way facilitated Timofey’s communication with both his mother and his sister; they communicate and see each other whenever they want,” the lawyer assured.

Oksana Danielova added that last week Agata Muceniece spent almost a week with Mia’s father and brother while on vacation; “This completely rules out speculation that the father created all kinds of barriers to the children’s communication and that the children were isolated from school.” relative to each other.”