Johnny Depp’s attorney tells the jury, “What you have at the end is Miss Heard’s word: do you trust?” – Update

Second update: Johnny Depp’s attorney rounded out his concluding arguments, focusing in part on Amber Heard’s $ 100 million deal.

Camille Vasquez told the jury that when Depp is sued for libel, Herd must prove that his insulting allegations are not lies.

Herd’s response is based on statements from Adam Waldman, who told the Daily Mail that Herd’s allegations of violence were fabricated.

Vasquez said there was “clear evidence that Waldmann believed Herd had lied.” Depp’s attorney also tried to corroborate Herd’s argument that Waldman’s remarks damaged his reputation, arguing that his negative press coverage had nothing to do with those comments.

He also appealed Herd’s damages claim, citing testimony from Warner Bros. CEO Walter Hamada, who claimed the actor’s salary had not been reduced. acquaman 2 Although its importance has diminished.

“After all, what you have is Miss Heard’s word, do you trust him?” Vasquez said.

Vazquez also challenged Herd’s attorney, Ben Rothenborn, on his claim that the jurors only needed a domestic violence case to get them to drop the Depp defamation case.

“Either he’s telling the truth, even in the most extreme allegations, or he’s lying,” he said. Vazquez said that in his Washington Post article, Herd claimed that Depp was physically and sexually abused, not just emotionally.

He also turned to Depp’s text messages, some of which used graphic and violent language in Herd. Their advocacy group sued them multiple times during the trial. In one of Paul Bethany’s messages, Depp wrote: “Let’s drown before we burn !!! Then I’ll bury his burnt body to make sure he’s dead.”

Vazquez said the messages reflected Depp’s “unique writing style,” Hunter S. said of Thompson’s model.

Recognizing that style isn’t “everyone’s a cup of tea”, Vazquez said, “Using bad words … won’t make you a violent person.”

Update: Johnny Depp’s attorney told the jury that Amber Heard’s domestic violence allegations made no sense as the actress did not accuse any of the women of physical abuse.

“Before Amber Heard, no woman had claimed that Mr. Depp had approached her for 58 years,” attorney Benjamin Chu told the jury, adding that no woman had been charged since Heard’s time.

“This is a MeToo without a MeToo.”

He said Depp supported the MeToo movement, but claimed the movement was a “survivor of real violence”.

“Gentleman.

In his argument, Chum also claimed that Depp “is not a saint”. “He’s got his faults about him, which he admits to him, but he’s not a violent harasser,” he told him.

Depp admitted he was addicted, but Chuu said “there is a big difference between drug problems and physical abuse.”

Earlier that day, in Depp’s team’s final discussion, another of Depp’s attorneys, Camille Vasquez, determined that the actor, and not Amber Heard, had been the victim of “constant verbal, emotional and physical abuse.” .

“There is a victim of domestic violence in this courtroom and this is not Ms. Herd,” Vasquez told the jury.

Vasquez noted that it’s been six years on Friday since Herd went to court to get a restraining order against Depp at his home after an argument in his penthouse in downtown Los Angeles.

But Vasquez called the classroom scene “narrow” and claimed Herd had arranged press coverage to make sure photographers captured his blue face. He claimed that Depp hit him on the phone. But Vasquez suggested that Herd had sustained his injuries and that “the world only saw what he wanted to see.”

“Exactly six years later, we ask you to bring Mr. Depp back into his life,” Vasquez said.

When Herd filed for divorce six months ago, Vasquez said he didn’t just want to end their marriage, he “wanted to destroy it.”

Vasquez played audio clips of Herd arguing with Depp, in which laughter could be heard and appeared to be laughing at her husband.

“Miss Herd is a person who has repeatedly confessed to violence,” Vasquez said, referring to an audio recording in which Herd spoke of hitting Depp. Conversely, Vasquez claimed that Depp had never committed physical violence against Herd.

Depp sued Herd for $ 50 million in a December 2018 article in the Washington Post, writing, “Two years ago, I became a public figure representing domestic violence and felt the wrath of our culture against women. Rebaño asked for $ 100 million because she complied with her allegations of violence.

Prior to the oral discussion, Judge Penny Azkarat instructed the jury in the sentencing process, reflecting the high bar each side must prove their case. In Depp’s case, the jury had to consider three statements made by Heard in a Washington Post article and in each case whether his side approved seven points. Do they include claims about Depp, are they slanderous, are they false, and show real evil?

Herd faces a similar burden of proof, and the jury must decide whether his lawyers have proven five different things. They consider three different charges, including that of Adam Waldmann, who argued that the charges against Herd were abusive. They also need to determine if Waldman acted as an agent for Depp.

Depp and Herd were present in the courtroom for a concluding discussion.

Chum said the Washington Post article clearly spoke of Depp. And that Herd “traded allegations of violence” against him for his new role as ACLU ambassador for domestic violence. She said the work’s influence had a profound effect on Depp’s reputation, citing USA Today’s essay coverage of Herd’s previous allegations against him.

Vasquez called Herd a manipulative figure and provided a testament to the actor’s emotional and mental state. He called Herd a “deeply disturbed man” who required attention.

Vasquez even suggested that when Herd witnessed it, he faked his most emotional moments, arguing that even when the actor cried, there were no tears. Vasquez was followed by the acting coach’s testimony, who said Herd had a hard time faking such fillings.

“It was a game,” Vasquez said of Herd’s testimony.

Vasquez noted that there were no medical records of physical assault in Herd’s allegations.

Vasquez made what he described as inconsistencies in Herd’s claims to address his specific allegations of violence. He showed Herd’s jury photos taken on December 15, 2015, when he appeared Late show with James Corden. Herd claimed that prior to this appearance he had been physically assaulted by Depp, who knocked him to the ground and pulled out a lock of his hair. “This [the Corden photos] According to the brutal attack and severe injuries Miss Herd testifies to? Vasquez asked the jury.

He also showed Hardy side-by-side photos taken on May 21, 2016. It was the night Depp and Herd had a fight that ultimately led to their wedding. One of the photos showed Herd blushing in the face, which he said was due to a phone call from Depp. The other showed no redness. Vazquez disputed Herd’s claim that they were two separate photos, different in that the light was on in one, noting that “they were taken at exactly the same time and have the same file.”

“You don’t have to trust these photos,” he said.

Vasquez said what Herd’s side showed was a “mountain of groundless accusations”.

“Either she’s a victim of really horrible violence, or she’s a woman willing to say anything,” she said.