“Shocked”, Borne announces that she refuses to see Anatomy of a Fall: because it is a problem

Justine Triet brought together 1 million spectators who came to see the excellent Anatomy of a fallBut Elisabeth Borne is not one of them.

In an interview for The world published on September 28, the Prime Minister said “offended” from Justine Triet’s speech. Last May, the director warned against the practices of a government based on “an increasingly uninhibited dominant power. »

Justine Triet, guilty of recalling that the government had imposed pension reform through “domination”

“ I’m blocking »I was “offended”. In the columns of WorldÉlisabeth Borne tried justify the fact that he won’t go to see Justine Triet’s Palme d’Or.

What is the origin of this block? THE speech by Justine Triet at the time of the presentation of the Palme d’Or in Cannes. With emotion and firmness, the director paid homage to the “ historic, extremely powerful and unanimous challenge to pension reform”. Last May Triet observed: “This protest has been shockingly denied and repressed”. According to her, this management is emblematic of a “model of increasingly uninhibited dominant power” from a “ neoliberal government »of which she accuses “commodification of culture”.

An emotional vocabulary that obscures a political reality

Elizabeth Borne, who imposed this reform with 49.3 he declared himself anyway “offended” from these words. It is interesting to note that the Prime Minister has chosen a vocabulary of the emotional orderDespite Justine Triet’s speech was not personal. Likewise the fact that the prime minister doesn’t go and see Anatomy of a fall and the declare publicly In The world East eminently political.

This prejudice delegitimized Justine Triet’s speech justifies turning one’s back on artists who do not adhere to the government’s ideology.

Fortunately, the Prime Minister’s choices regarding which films to see in theaters have not stopped Justine Triet from directing the best start to a Palme d’Or since 2008.