According to science, being “hungry” isn’t just an excuse, it’s a real thing.
This word is used to describe someone who is angry or frustrated because they are very hungry.
It’s been used for millennials and social media for years, but it became so popular in 2018 that it was added to the Oxford English Dictionary.
Scientists now say that hunger is directly linked to our emotional health.
Participants were asked to write down how hungry they were and how they felt five times a day using an app.
Lead author Professor Viren Swami, a psychologist at Anglia Ruskin University in London, said there was a “staggering” lack of research on sniffing.
“Following people in their daily lives, we found that hunger was linked to levels of anger, irritability, and pleasure,” he added.
By proving that the hanged man is real, he hopes people will recognize him and jump out.
According to science, being “hungry” isn’t just an excuse, it’s a real thing. Researchers found that hunger is directly related to our emotional health (file image)
Professor Swami said: “Many of us are aware that being hungry can affect our emotions, but surprisingly very little scientific research has focused on being ‘angry’.
“While our research offers no way to alleviate negative emotions caused by hunger, research suggests that naming an emotion can help people regulate it, for example by recognizing that we are angry just because we are hungry.
“Therefore, increased ‘hunger’ awareness may reduce the likelihood that hunger will translate into negative emotions and behaviors in individuals.”
Researchers recruited 64 people from Central Europe who recorded their hunger levels and various measures of emotional well-being over a 21-day period.
They reported their hunger and emotions five times a day on a smartphone app.
Hunger was associated with 37% of the variance in irritability, 34% of the variance in anger, and 38% of the variance in pleasure recorded by the participants.
The effects were significant, including taking into account factors such as age and gender, body mass index, eating behavior and individual personality traits.
The results were published in the journal Plos One.
“This ‘hanging’ effect has not been analyzed in detail,” said psychologist Professor Stefan Stieger from the Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences in Austria, who participated in the research.
“So we took a field approach where participants were asked to respond to requests to fill out short surveys on an app.
“These messages were sent five times a day on semi-random occasions over a three-week period.
“This allowed us to generate dense longitudinal data in a way that was not possible with traditional laboratory research.
“While this approach requires a lot of effort – not just for the participants, but also for the researchers who design such studies – the results offer a high degree of generalizability compared to laboratory studies and give us a much more complete picture of how people perceive the emotional consequences of hunger in their daily lives.
In 2019, BBC Good Food magazine included the word “hangry” as part of a food lexicon to celebrate their 30th anniversary.
The phrase dates back to 1956, when it was published in a psychoanalytic journal, but has only recently become popular.
Doing all your workouts on the weekend is just as beneficial as being active on a regular basis.
According to research, doing all the exercises at once on the weekend or spreading them over the week makes no difference in terms of health.
One study found no difference in death rates between “weekend warriors” and people who were regularly active.
This was achieved provided they received 150 minutes of moderate exercise or 75 minutes of vigorous physical activity each week, such as brisk walking, swimming or cycling.
It indicates that the cumulative number of active minutes is more important than when the exercise actually took place.
The findings are significant for people who have fewer opportunities for daily or regular physical activity during the work week, the researchers said.
A Chinese-led team of experts surveyed 350,978 adults with an average age of 41.
Participants were interviewed about their physical activity levels between 1997 and 2013.
They were then divided according to whether they did 150 minutes of exercise one or two days a week, three or more days, or no exercise at all.
The researchers then tracked how many participants died over the next decade.
By the end of the study, 21,898 of the participants had died – 6,035 from cardiovascular events such as heart failure and 4,130 from cancer.
Weekend warriors were found to be 8% less likely to die than people who didn’t complete 150 minutes per workout.
People who dispersed their exercise throughout the week were 15% less likely to die than those who were inactive.
But the researchers said there was no significant difference in mortality rates between weekend warriors and regular athletes, when considering total time spent exercising.
The team’s findings were published in the Jama internal medicine tree trunk.
Source: Daily Mail

I am Anne Johnson and I work as an author at the Fashion Vibes. My main area of expertise is beauty related news, but I also have experience in covering other types of stories like entertainment, lifestyle, and health topics. With my years of experience in writing for various publications, I have built strong relationships with many industry insiders. My passion for journalism has enabled me to stay on top of the latest trends and changes in the world of beauty.