To please the public or to take it back: Mr. Male “Modi: Three days in the wings of madness” how Johnny Depp

Johnny Depp “Modi: Three Days in Wings of Madness” was released on January 30th. And in the last few years, considering that the actor himself was usually taken by the brush, it is more interesting to see.

Most of them know Depp as an actor, one can follow their musical performances. However, the picture is a relatively new passion. And for him, we can assume that he is a way of shedding the experiences and thoughts of the last years of his stormy life. One of them is enough to remember the last series of pictures that Vanessa Paradis depicts her mother in the style of tarot cards. For this reason, the image of the artist tram is also estimated to have the thoughts of Antics and Art No, No and Johnny Depp’s image.

It doesn’t make sense to re -describe the biography of Amadeo Modigliani. Three days is enough to understand what the artist breathes and what he sees around the artist. Unlike many Bayopiks, it is nice that there is nothing dramatic here. From the first frames, at the beginning of the 20th century, we find ourselves in Montparnasas, where the windows of expensive coffee houses contrast with the poor inhabitants, and at night, parks and streets turn into a beauty and real holiday vouchers.

The hero of Riccardo Samarcho joins all this madness and noisy bohemia on the one hand, on the other hand it looks restless. His works are avant -garde, but he does not fit any of the popular niches. And if his friend-artist Chaim Sutin knows how to be isolated and decaying meat from the reality in his room, he doesn’t realize that he is attached to him, on the contrary, Modigliani passes through the semi-will and sees the secret march of reality. His dead soldiers.

At the same time, the artist’s world is not only about Weltschmerz or the world sorrow. There is a place for jokes, friendship and true love. What is the scene at the beginning of the film, where the French bourgeois looked at Amadeo Modigliani with discontent, but softens when he approaches the most discontent and draws a portrait of his wife. However, because the artist rejected him uncertain and fights, it is worth contacting the irregular man with a portrait and his wife’s desire to draw.

However, modiglians seem to be injured by the decay as the feeling that it is invisible in the art world. On the one hand, he wants to be recognized, but after rejecting a rejection, he enters into a painful dispute, then is ready to destroy his creations.

Apparently, Modigliani’s Bayopik began to get rid of a creative crisis and reflect urgent problems. Who are we creating art for – for ourselves or for others? As a result, many contemporaries, including Art experts, have seen their work as cheerful while recognizing their genius. Their reactions can be understood: during the war, at least when you want to think of death, these portraits with lifeless eyes on their faces cannot be hanged on the wall.

In another scene, Amadeo Modigliani is trying to sell his work to Maurice Ganya, a collector and philanthropist who played by Al Pacino. “You are not an artist, a sculptor,” he finishes, only 80 francs for three works. Although Modigliani did not have to encounter criticism for the first time, we see how he insulted him, that a person who does not create anything in his life is claimed at such desperate and poor expense, but that he experiences beauty deeply and the pain of this world.

Success and recognition are not always art criteria. And this forces free artists to agree with the idea that no one will do their work. Modigliani refuses to sell pictures, but not from anger, but protesting the system in which it is evaluated by those who do not understand anything in art.

On the other hand, artists lie to themselves that they do not need to be recognized. Indeed, in this case, they would not show their work to anyone. Modigliani wanted to be seen. And fortunately, there was a man who saw the artist’s talent in his life. Poetry Beatrice Gastings, model and muse of inspiration. They lived in the same apartment and spent speeches about beauty and art in the evening.

It was so that Amadeo Modigliani canvases, who did not comply with any classification of “IZM ,, began to be appreciated after his death. It is not a coincidence that the name of Modi is compatible with the French word Maudis, that is, the damn. A man blessed with the artist’s gift had to endure obsceneness and poverty until the end of his days.

At the same time, contrary to many similar stories, the film “Modi: Three Days in the Wings of Madness” does not try to pity the fate of the hero. The narrative does not tragically explode, but what forces us to connect to the dialogue that is more important – to satisfy or create the people, to ignore the needs of others to create an understandable art for people who will decorate the circle or to close their own worlds. How do you know where the line between the freedom and independence of the creator and arrogance? Let’s see what the author thinks.