It’s a precedent-setting decision that could further restrict the rights of queer people in the United States.
This Friday, June 30, the conservative majority in the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Lorie Smith, the head of “303 Creative,” a Colorado-based website creation company. In 2018, the latter claimed to have the right under the First Amendment to the Constitution to refuse to offer its services to gay and lesbian couples. “ I want to create unique sites to celebrate the beauty of marriage between a man and a woman “he said last December from the steps of the Tribunal. But “Colorado is trying to force me to (…) promote ideas that are contrary to my faith.”
Read also: The Supreme Court shoots the right to abortion In the USA
The first amendment of the constitution at the center of the debate
Since 2008, this state in the center of the United States prohibits merchants from discriminating against their customers on the basis of their sexual orientation, under penalty of a fine. In reality, Lorie Smith has not been approached by a same-sex couple, nor prosecuted by Colorado authorities. It was she who sued state law preemptively. After losing in an appeals court, she took her case to the Supreme Court, where an initial hearing was held on December 5, 2022.
This Friday, by 6 votes to 3, the Supreme Court ruled in his favor by ruling that the First Amendment forbade the state of Colorado from forcing Lorie Smith to go against her religious values.
“A sad day in the life of LGBT people”
The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative American Christian legal advocacy group known for its anti-LGBTQ stances, welcomed the decision. “The United States Supreme Court has rightly held that the government cannot force Americans to say things they do not believe”Kristin Wagoner, the association’s general counsel, said in a statement, quoted by The New York Times.
For her part, Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court, said: Today is a sad day for US constitutional law and for the lives of LGBT people. The US Supreme Court holds that a particular type of business, while open to the public, has the constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class. The Court does so for the first time in its history.”. “The immediate and symbolic effect of this decision is to mark gays and lesbians with second-class status »she added.
Do you like our articles? You will love our newsletters! Sign up for free on this page.
More articles about
Rights of LGBTQI+ people
-
One year later Roe vs. Wade, a brilliant documentary analyzes the threats to abortion in Europe
-
Pride, 10 years of marriage for everyone, LGBTphobic attacks… The BookClub live on Twitch
-
In Nantes, LGBTphobic tags discovered on a city street
-
Gen Z, more LGBT+ than their elders? A study confirms this
-
“No fetish at Pride”: the eternal debate on leather and latex in LGBTI+ marches
Source: Madmoizelle

Mary Crossley is an author at “The Fashion Vibes”. She is a seasoned journalist who is dedicated to delivering the latest news to her readers. With a keen sense of what’s important, Mary covers a wide range of topics, from politics to lifestyle and everything in between.