Amber Heard Says Johnny Depp’s Winning Decision Should Be Taken To New Trial; Jury Review Questions Increased

One month after Johnny Depp won the multimillion-dollar defamation lawsuit against former Amber HeardPirates of the Caribbean The star is now officially facing his first attempt to topple his legitimate victory with a punch or two.

“For all the above-mentioned reasons and the reasons stated in the lawsuit and trial, interim injunction and strike motions, Mr. Heard respectfully requests this court to change the decision in favor of the jury. Against Mr. Depp and all of Ms. Heard, dismiss the complaint or, alternatively, order a new trial,” says the not-so-surprising memorandum presented in Virginia District Court on July 1. water man Star Lawyers (read here).

Heard has long claimed that he was abused by Depp. He told a UK court and a US lawsuit in 2020 that Depp had repeatedly sexually harassed him.

From the time that Judge Penny Azcarat handed over the $10 million judgment to Depp on June 1 in the Fairfax, VA courtroom, Heard’s $100 million defense and prosecution team, led by Elian Bredhoft, has made it clear that they will appeal. It appears to have closed an entry point when Judge Azcarat, at the final hearing on June 24, demanded that Heard pay $8.35 million bail to begin any appeal.

Surprisingly, however, is the uppercut that Heard is pushing at full speed to the Jury. Unlike the six-year deep requirement for a precedent- and process-based decision, claims of jury review can be explosive.

“Mr Heard further requests that this court investigate possible misconduct by the jury and take appropriate action as a result of the investigation,” the 43-page letter states. After Depp first sued his ex-wife roman diary At the beginning of 2019, he played for $ 50 million at the end of 2018. Washington post With his sideline open, this move against the integrity of the court through the 15th juror is a new high-stakes strategy.

“The information on the jury panel list appears to be inconsistent with the identity and demographics of one of the jurors,” says the note signed by Bredhoft. Juror 15 appears to have been born in 1970, not 1945 as reported, and was relied upon by parties, including Ms. Heard, for juror selection, the document says.

He adds sternly about the Old Dominion court, “Given the requirements to verify every juror, it seems that jurors’ identities are not verified.” “It is unclear whether juror 15 has been called for jury duty or is qualified for jury duty. This requires the court to conduct an investigation to determine whether a jury was actually summoned and whether the parties’ rights to due process were violated. Depending on the outcome of the investigation, this may require a complete reversal of the decision and a re-examination of the matter.”

After an apparently six-week trial, a seven-member jury awarded Depp $10 million in damages and $5 million in punitive damages, the latter reduced to $350,000 due to a cap under Virginia law. In the new report dated July 1, echoing the statements made by Heard and his lawyers after the hearing, it was stated that “The decision is legally excessive in the light of the evidence and the law and must be overturned.”

“The dueling jury’s decisions are inconsistent and uncompromising, further exposing the confusion caused by Mr Depp’s attempts to address the 2016 internal affairs issue without the accuracy of the UK decision,” the note says, emphasizing both variable pairings. Temporary Restraint Order Prompt Divorce. It also trumps Depp’s loss in a libel suit he filed against Rupert Murdoch in the Atlantic in late 2020. inside One tabloid called him a “partner beater”.

“A $2 million libel award against Ms. Heard is inconsistent with a $15 million libel award to Mr Depp,” the documents said, which many saw as misrepresenting Heard’s 2020 lawsuit decision. . .

Basically, an article by the ACLU attributed to Jeff Bezos Wow Without mentioning Depp’s name, the actor said it “destroyed” his already dying career. In court and on the bench, Depp continued to insist that he was the abuser in the relationship.

Rarely talking about the First Amendment until he closed the debate, Heard’s team is now focusing on the scope and depth needed to reach a defamation claim, as Depp has done before. They say the former Oscar nominee and his team at Brown Rudnick LLP fell short of the standard:

For the jury to establish that Ms. Heard’s actual misconduct, Mr. Depp would be asked to determine that at the time of the article’s publication, Ms. Heard did not believe he had been abused or abused. I suspected harassment. However, Depp offered no evidence that he did not believe Heard was being abused. Instead, the evidence overwhelmingly revealed that Ms Heard believed that Mr Depp had abused her. As a result, Mr. Depp did not meet the legal requirements for actual wrongdoing and the conviction must be overturned.

Depp’s representatives and the legal team led by Ben Chew and Camille Vazquez did not respond to requests for comment today on Heard’s new motion and the accompanying memo. On the other hand, Hollywood Vampires guitarist Depp himself, who appeared on stage with Jeff Beck several times during and after the jury deliberations in England last month, also took to social media this weekend. Depp, who has shown little fanfare in the hours and days since the defamation decision, has yet to give a direct response to the new announcement: