DC fans collide on which Superman movie reigns supreme Superman or Man of Steel?

With James Gunn’S Superman Now in cinemas, a new debate has turned on through the Fandom DC. While fans discuss which superman version is better David Corenswet OR Henry CavillOther fans are discussed which film is better.

It is Gunn’s hope and bright vision on Steel man better than Zack SnyderThe 2013 epic? The answer depends on who you ask and the fans do not hold back.

What started as a simple screen of screenwriter on X quickly transmitted in a yield of the cinematographic accounts. On the one hand, you have Snyder’s Gritty, Opeatic Steel manLed by Sutro Superman of Cavill, a hero burdened by his own power and alienation.

On the other hand, Gunn offers something completely different with a colorful and optimistic film that proudly wears its comic roots, with Corenswet declaring that “kindness is the new punk rock”.

For some fans, Gunn’s film offers everything they have lost.

“I love both for several reasons, but Superman captures perfectly what Superman should represent and feels like a successor of Reeve’s films. It is extravagant, optimistic and encouraging. Gunn has just nailed the character in a way we have not seen for decades,” wrote @nljigakulive.

Others indicate Gunn’s humor and playful additions like Krypto, the superdog.

“Both good, but I say Superman. The influx of humor of James Gunn combined with the addition of Krypto as a semi-Main character you take it in a notch above, “said @Btblitzpgh.

But Snyder’s loyalists claim that Gunn’s film, although fascinating, does not have the epic weight he has made Steel man feel so monumental.

“I thought Superman it was beautiful but mannnn Steel man As soon as they are connected on many more levels and it was written much better. Many big bass and high within that film, you really empathize for the Snyders version because of how alienated its superman on earth “, supported @maxonunimited ..

Some even suggest Gunn’s ambition to lay the foundations for a new DC universe prevented the film from becoming bigger:

“James Gunn Superman It is truly a accurate comic superman, surely every character is faithful to the material of origin. But I feel that if James Gunn did not have the burden of establishing a universe, it would have been more epic. I honestly lost the epicosity I tried in Man of Steel, “added @anonismind.

Others are torn, appreciating elements of both:

“Man of Steel is a better film, but I see him in a certain sense like his things. Henry’s Superman does not seem to me to Superman, even if it is about history.

In the end, the debate seems one of those topics of the playground that will never have a definitive winner. Both films adopt radically different approaches to the same icon and perhaps okay. A fan summarized better:

“@Jamesgunn made a fantastic film @Zacksnyder made a fantastic comparison of the fans of the film” is the thief of joy. “Most of this Superman drama is an anger of anger so that people can pay bills.

So, which you prefer: the new hope of Gunn’s Supermanor the opera intensity of Snyder Steel man? Or are you just happy that both exist? Let us know in the comments.