Mark Hamill shares his super dark tone for Luke Skywalker’s background in Star Wars

Mark Hamill He recently opened on a tragic background of Luke Skywalker, but perhaps it was too dark for a franchise built around hope, redemption and adventure for families.

In an apparition on Bullseye with Jesse Thorn’s podcast, Hamill shared a shot he had for Luke’s past, one who never arrived on the big screen. While Hamill respects The last Jedi director Rian Johnson And his narrative, he did not completely agree with the choice to make Luke a depressed hermit, hiding on the isolated planet ahch-to.

Hamill felt that Luke’s descent into exile would have been more compelling if he had been fueled by such a devastating personal loss that he broke his connection with the Jedi. Hamill shared:

“I thought:” What could make someone give up what is basically a religious entity, to give up being a Jedi? “Well, the love of a woman [Luke] He falls in love with a woman, gives up being a Jedi, have a son together.

“At a certain point, the child, like a child, collects an unattended laser sword, pushes the button and is killed instantly. The wife is so full of pain, he kills himself … but herself [Rian Johnson] I didn’t have time to say such a background, I guess. He just wanted a short thing to explain it. “

Whoa … this background is certainly tragic, but turns into the territory that could be difficult for some Star Wars Fans to swallow. Yes, the franchise dealt with heavy themes, from the fall of Anakin Skywalker to the death of children such as young people in Revenge of SithBut the added layer of a mourning mother who takes her life after the accidental death of her son feels almost too dark for the franchise.

The background proposed by Hamill would have introduced pain and loss to an unbearable level, pushing the limits of what is acceptable within the Star Wars universe. But, Andor Pushed strong with these themes, but the franchise was not ready for that kind of thing when Lucasfilm was developing The last Jedi.

The last Jedi It tells a different story. Instead of focusing on a personal tragedy involving love and loss, Luke’s exile is guided by his shame and fault for a momentary interval of judgment regarding his nephew, well alone.

When Luke warned the darkness that grew within Ben, he began to end his life in a short time to prevent the galaxy from suffering in the rise of another Sith gentleman. But he woke up just in time to destroy the Jedi temple of Luke, leading to the retreat of Luke to Ahch-to.

He is not just abandoning the Jedi order; He is abandoning the trust of his best friends, Han and Leia, failing their son. His exile was not born from a simple failure; It is a failure with the emotional weight. The fault of having failed his nephew and having seen another collapse of Jedi orders weighs heavily Luke.

Although some fans criticize Luke’s actions The last JediThere is a layer of emotional complexity here that makes sense, even if at the beginning it seems disconcerting.

Some fans were upset by Luke’s representation as a destroyed man who gave up everything he once believed in, but others saw him as a deep and humanizing bow, a man who fought with faith, fault and redemption. Johnson’s approach is emotionally resonant, focusing on Luke’s growth as a character rather than trying to justify his actions with a darker and more complex background.

He had transformed the tragic background of Hamill The last JediIt may have changed the tone of the entire film. The concept of a tragic love story that ends with death and despair is undeniably powerful, but it is difficult to imagine The last Jedi Take that dip in such a dark territory without losing some balance.

While both versions of Luke’s background will be deep emotional wounds, Johnson’s choice allows growth and redemption in the end. What do you think of Hamill’s tone?