Hidden signs in the pictures of the great artists who are still trying to solve

There are many unresolved secrets in the world, and many of them are literally in front of us – in ordinary things. For example, in the paintings of the great artists presented in museums and galleries. However, we do not think that we have a real puzzle that all generations have decided by all generations, passing through them. Especially for Peoplatalk, the writers of the telegraph channel art spirit wife Christina Seredinskaya and Julia Besky’s writers explained the secrets of popular work.

Christina Seredinzskaya and Julia Besky

Art, as you know, speaks metaphors and symbols in the language of symbols. Apparently, some artists weren’t just the creators, they came with riddles, so they flirted with the audience. In some works, the old password is hidden in others – a philosophical message or a fun rebus, so that the grandchildren shake their heads for centuries. We offer you five more hidden pictures than it seems at first glance, or at least it is widely believed.

“Secret Office”, Leonardo da Vinci (1495-1498)

Apparently a simple canonical scene about Jesus and his 12 students, but considering, looks like a frame from Dan Brown’s film. Who are all these people? Why one of them is Mary Magdalene’s facial features? Where is Halo? Why does Christ lie on the bread and next to it – apparently a hand with a knife without a knife?

And the mathematical proportions of the study also draw attention, and the score is stored. Some researchers argue that if you play certain lines of the artist’s painting as musical notes, you will get a melody and that you will even get a map of the Place of the Holy Zear, according to one of the theories. Rumor has it that Leonardo da Vinci hid more riddles than his personal diaries in his work. And the longer you look at him, the more powerful someone here knows.

Mona Lisa, Leonardo da Vinci (1503-1505)

The portrait that everyone knows, but no one could understand the secret meaning to the end. Who is a woman with a mysterious half? Lisa Del Jocondo? Leonardo da Vinci is in the image of a woman? Or maybe the ideal of divine harmony and beauty?

Many of them are sure that a secret is hidden in their gaze. Some scientists equipped with microscopes argue that you can see the LV letters in the eyes of Mona Lisa – that you can see the abbreviation of the artist’s name and surname. Other researchers say that possible anatomical inconsistencies on their face may be the result of some hidden concept or plan of the so -called author, showing the oddities in the mouth or eye. And the landscape behind it, according to the experts, is not just a background, but a coded geographical map in which the Azzone Visconti Bridge of the XIV century in Lekko can be clearly seen, Southwest Alps and Garlata, which Leonardo da Vinci visited about 500 years ago.

Scientists also argue that you can see the number 72 in the belt of the bridge depicted behind Mona Lisa, and despite the deleted number 4, the picture has 149 number. However, no one can solve what these numerical combinations mean.

Perhaps the secret itself should remain unresolved. In the end, perhaps it is the uncertainty that allows us to return to the picture over and over again, look for new meanings, and examine a smile and look in detail. It is like a riddle without an answer, but the search process itself becomes a real art.

“Scream”, Edward Munk (1893)

Apparently we have already understood everything about “scream :: the figure on the bridge, the terrible background and the existential horror in the same album (existential fear – Approximately. Ed.). However, as it emerged, Edward Munk liked to leave rids in his works in addition to the struggle against anxiety. In a version of the picture at the beginning of the central character, you can see the inscriptions: “He can only write a madman.”

For a long time, it was believed that the visitor was like intervening in the exhibition where the study was presented, but modern research, including infrared shooting and handwriting, confirmed that this was really the text added by Munk himself. Scientists suggest that one of the artist’s medical students in the pre -show states that the author is probably mentally unbalanced.

Curator May Britt Guleng interprets Munk’s behavior ironic, but at the same time, he also makes a vulnerable attempt to control the narrative about his work and to show that he remains as a person with humor and pain despite criticism. Such a gesture, in fact, becomes an attempt to respond to accusations using something difficult to ignore – his own view of his own painting and perception.

“Spring”, Sandro Botticelli (1482)

At first glance, “Spring” is an old picture that depicts a festive scene in the forest: Venus, Marshmallow, Fairy, Orange – everything as expected. However, the more you look at the job, the more questions will emerge. Who are these mysterious virgins? Why does one of them turn into a flower? And why did the artist describe 200 different plant species in trees in detail?

The painting has various interpretations, and one of them claims that the figures were built as an allegory of the change of the seasons – from the emergence of spring to the summer of Venus and mercury by Marshmallow.

According to another version, it is believed that the second cousin Lorenzo Medici, who ordered a picture as a gift for a wedding, is hidden in the picture. According to many researchers, oranges in the trees serve as a metonymic symbol of the Medici family, not only a reserve, but also the political influence. Mercury personalized the mind and speech in ancient Rome, and had its own Merkural celebrations celebrated in May. And the wedding of Lorenzo de Pierfranchico had to take place this month.

In addition, the composition is made through the spirit of neoplatonism, popular in the Renaissance and actively supported by Politzino and Marsilio Ficino philosophers.

It turns out that “Spring olmad is not only an appearance of flora and mythological figures. This is a complex philosophical, political and social allegory that Botticelli’s Medici family expresses their ideas about love, power and harmony, full of symbols associated with myths and non -platonic teachings and subtle philosophical subtitles.

American Gothic, Grant Wood (1930)

According to a dioly and official version, a boring farmer who is a woman with a daughter (kinship, perhaps there is still no dispute about his wives) stands in the style of gothic gothic ”. At first glance there is nothing special. But here is the secret: Who are these people and what exactly is they hiding behind their faces?

Some researchers believe that a picture is satire on the ideals of American values ​​and rural life, on the contrary, this is their glorification. Some referred to religious seriousness and purity morality in its plan, while others shocked the country in the 1930s. However, there are more eccentric interpretations: for example, the dioly in the hands of the hero of the painting is a symbol of resistance and hard work. It is also similar to Poseidon’s Trident, which personally personalizes power in Greek mythology. In Christianity, PitchFork is associated with Satan and evil.

The apron of a woman also creates many questions – both an element of daily life and the symbol of a strict, settled tradition. All this together has created an exciting painting for decades of the imagination of the audience for decades. As a result, “American Gothic” continues to be a study in which everything is owed to interpret itself, but a single interpretation is not ultimately considered.

“American Gothic” is not only one of the strange and mysterious paintings, but also scandal. According to rumors, after Grant Wood’s public presentation, farmers did not laugh at irony, but threatened to deal with him. A village woman was so angry that she threatened the artist to bite her ear. Another local resident has made the author of the painting a disappointing diagnosis – “head problems ..

In every stain of the brush of great artists, a password can be hidden, a thought invitation to think or simply a great artistic joke. Maybe they didn’t want us to dig the details with a magnifier, but who would stop us? Next time, when I look at the picture, do not rush to say, “There is nothing special.” Perhaps you are faced with the most strange and skillful quest in the history of art.

Source: People Talk