“What was in her head”: the tattoo of the one-year-old son Ratajkowski struck the master

Emily Ratajkowski put her young son in danger by getting a tattoo on his body.

Recently, the American model boasted a tattoo. Only not on his own body, but on the body of his own child, who had barely left infancy.

Tattoo artist Alexander Ogev spoke about the act of Ratakovsky. It is difficult for him to imagine what the star mother was guided by when she made such a decision.

“This is most likely some kind of achievement. That’s how she just grabbed attention. We can only philosophize on this topic: what was on her mind when she did it,” he said.

According to the master, it is impossible to get a tattoo at such a young age, because the consequences are very difficult to predict:

“A child of one year – no! Anything can happen to a child’s skin. And even if there were thousands of tests for allergies of some kind, it’s not a fact that it won’t happen later. Because it may not have manifested itself at such a young age. The reaction may be later in life.

The expert also assessed the appearance of the tattoo. According to Alexander Ognev, it is made in the upper layers of the skin, so that the risk of complications is minimized.

Photo source: Emily Ratajkowski screenshot / Social media

“When they did it, most likely they put it in the superficial layers of the skin, most likely it wouldn’t even hurt. They seemed to scratch the skin a little bit. Most likely, such a tattoo will disappear quickly over time. on the look of the tattoo, it will just peel off, so most likely it won’t do any damage,” the expert said.

The master also once again recalled that such experiments on a child’s body, especially at such a young age, are highly undesirable.

Ratajkowski’s experiment with her son was also reviewed from a legal point of view. The lawyer said: if the star had lived in Russia, such an act would certainly not have gotten away with it so easily.

Photo source: Legion-Media

Author: Anna Skvortsova Olga Tarantina