NASA scientists defeated Armageddon Michael Bay for a stupid plot and scientific inaccuracy

NASA scientists defeated Armageddon Michael Bay for a stupid plot and scientific inaccuracy

NASA scientists defeated Armageddon Michael Bay for a stupid plot and scientific inaccuracy

Michael Bay’s film “Armageddon” has long been an example of a classic Hollywood -Blockbuster, in which logic is sacrificed to entertainment.

The photo published in 1998 collected more than $ 550 million, gave us a hit by Aerosmith and a scene with Ben Affleck on a tractor – but from a scientific point of view this is, to say the least, a disaster.

And now this was officially confirmed by NASA experts themselves. Astrophysicist Alister Bruce called “Armageddon” as an example of how you can go too far in everything in Hollywood.

“This asteroid is just damn great. That is why it is nice to talk about the film – because it is possible so Hollywood. They went into the principle of” more = better “, but overwhelmed,” he explained.

According to astrophysicist: “When it comes to heavenly bodies the size of a kilometer, it is already serious – the entire area of ​​the face of the earth can erase. Fortunately they are rarely found, and we follow them. But in the film this” Pebbles “does not notice the last few weeks. Although in reality we could look and what we would like to” and what we would? “

NASA scientists defeated Armageddon Michael Bay for a stupid plot and scientific inaccuracy

A plan for the rescue of the earth itself received individual criticism. According to the plot, the Burovik team flies into space to drill asteroid and blow from the inside. According to Alister Bruce, such a script does not face criticism:

“Even if you could evaporate the whole heavenly body, this does not mean that you have solved the problem. The wreck will still fly to the earth at the same speed. You just distributed a blow to a larger area.”

It is curious that NASA once really helped the makers of the film – the studio used real starting platforms and training facilities. But, as Bruce emphasizes, visual details are one thing and science is completely different:

“Some locations in the film are real. They were just filled with CGI. But the very scientific basis of the plot has nothing to do with reality.”

This criticism is far from new. Ben Affleck himself early in the DVD audio combination: “Why is it easier to learn to become astronauts than astronauts to drill?”

And he added: “At the moment Michael Bay asked me to keep your mouth shut.”

Source: Popcorn News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top Trending

Related POSTS