
The New York Times published a new review of the best films of the XXI Century – and the film leads in, which could skip many spectators.
This is a room drama against the background of the Second World War, without stars in the frame, without a loud advertising campaign and without the usual pathos of military blockbusters. Nevertheless, it was her critics who called the most important film of recent years.
The film took 12th place in the general list of NYT-Among all films of the current decade, released after 2020, this is the best results. At the same time, he even bypassed the “Oppenheimer” Christopher Nolan, who received the most important Oscar last year, but in the final list was only in 65th place.
It is about the photo of the “zone of interests” of the British director Jonathan Glaiser. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a high score – 93% of the positive reviews. At the Kassa he raised $ 52 million and took a reward for the best international film from the UK at the Oscar presentation. In Kinopoisk, however, he has a rather modest assessment – 6.9 out of 10.

“The area of interests” is no ordinary military film. This story is not about the front, but about the people who lived next to the disaster, as if nothing happened. The photo was taken with deliberately modest intonation and almost without the usual musical drama. According to many critics, this makes it so frightening – and so honest.
The film was shown for the first time in Cannes, where he received a Grand Prix. Since then, he has been talked about as one of the most powerful military dramas in recent decades. But in the Russian rent the tape remained almost unnoticed.
Source: Popcorn News

Kenneth Weaver is an author at “The Fashion Vibes”. He focuses on writing about celebrity-related news, keeping his readers up to date with the latest happenings in the entertainment industry. With a keen eye for detail and a passion for writing, Kenneth brings his unique perspective to every article he writes, making him a trusted source for all things celebrity.